The Academic Knowledge
and Language graphic visualises the role that language of publication plays
in the dissemination of academic knowledge through scholarly journals. It is
obvious from first glance that English is entirely dominant.
Scientist
meets Publisher is a YouTube video that
aims to get researchers thinking about signing away their copyright. Many
researchers unthinkingly assign copyright to journal publishers in the mistaken
belief that doing do is the only way to get work published.
Princeton University will stop
researchers from handing over their copyright to journal publishers, as part of
a new open access policy at the university. Currently, researchers at Princeton
and elsewhere 'give away' their work to journal publishers, and then have to
buy back the journals in which their work gets published. It is a system that
enriches publishers to the detriment of open scholarship.
Historically, peer-reviewed journals were published by
scientific societies on a non-profit basis. Today scholarly publishing is
dominated by a handful of large commercial publishers focused on maximising
their profits. This has left small society publishers struggling to survive and
libraries unable to afford all the journals they need.
Determining the order of authors on a scholarly
publication can be problematic, especially among interdisciplinary groups.
However, there are existing protocols that determine who should be credited as
an author on a publication.
The sheer volume of research can prevent researchers finding research that
might be relevant to their work, especially if it is not published in sources
they already use.What is needed in the age of the data deluge are tools
Facebook may be a
popular choice but if you want to network with other scientists, then ResearchGate may be a more useful social
network. It bills itself as the largest scientific network online, with more
than 1.2 million members.